Backward compatibility for Android applications

Hallo Friends cellphone prices and specifications, In the article that you are reading this time with the title Backward compatibility for Android applications, we have prepared this article well for you to read and take the information in it. hopefully the contents of the post Article Android 1.5, Article archive, Article compatibility, Article How-to, what we write you can understand. all right, have a nice reading..

Android 1.5 introduced a number of new features that application developers can take advantage of, like virtual input devices and speech recognition. As a developer, you need to be aware of backward compatibility issues on older devices—do you want to allow your application to run on all devices, or just those running newer software? In some cases it will be useful to employ the newer APIs on devices that support them, while continuing to support older devices.

If the use of a new API is integral to the program—perhaps you need to record video—you should add a manifest entry to ensure your app won't be installed on older devices. For example, if you require APIs added in 1.5, you would specify 3 as the minimum SDK version:

  <manifest>
...
<uses-sdk android:minSdkVersion="3" />
...
</manifest>

If you want to add a useful but non-essential feature, such as popping up an on-screen keyboard even when a hardware keyboard is available, you can write your program in a way that allows it to use the newer features without failing on older devices.

Using reflection

Suppose there's a simple new call you want to use, like android.os.Debug.dumpHprofData(String filename). The android.os.Debug class has existed since the first SDK, but the method is new in 1.5. If you try to call it directly, your app will fail to run on older devices.

The simplest way to call the method is through reflection. This requires doing a one-time lookup and caching the result in a Method object. Using the method is a matter of calling Method.invoke and un-boxing the result. Consider the following:

public class Reflect {
private static Method mDebug_dumpHprofData;

static {
initCompatibility();
};

private static void initCompatibility() {
try {
mDebug_dumpHprofData = Debug.class.getMethod(
"dumpHprofData", new Class[] { String.class } );
/* success, this is a newer device */
} catch (NoSuchMethodException nsme) {
/* failure, must be older device */
}
}

private static void dumpHprofData(String fileName) throws IOException {
try {
mDebug_dumpHprofData.invoke(null, fileName);
} catch (InvocationTargetException ite) {
/* unpack original exception when possible */
Throwable cause = ite.getCause();
if (cause instanceof IOException) {
throw (IOException) cause;
} else if (cause instanceof RuntimeException) {
throw (RuntimeException) cause;
} else if (cause instanceof Error) {
throw (Error) cause;
} else {
/* unexpected checked exception; wrap and re-throw */
throw new RuntimeException(ite);
}
} catch (IllegalAccessException ie) {
System.err.println("unexpected " + ie);
}
}

public void fiddle() {
if (mDebug_dumpHprofData != null) {
/* feature is supported */
try {
dumpHprofData("/sdcard/dump.hprof");
} catch (IOException ie) {
System.err.println("dump failed!");
}
} else {
/* feature not supported, do something else */
System.out.println("dump not supported");
}
}
}

This uses a static initializer to call initCompatibility, which does the method lookup. If that succeeds, it uses a private method with the same semantics as the original (arguments, return value, checked exceptions) to do the call. The return value (if it had one) and exception are unpacked and returned in a way that mimics the original. The fiddle method demonstrates how the application logic would choose to call the new API or do something different based on the presence of the new method.

For each additional method you want to call, you would add an additional private Method field, field initializer, and call wrapper to the class.

This approach becomes a bit more complex when the method is declared in a previously undefined class. It's also much slower to call Method.invoke() than it is to call the method directly. These issues can be mitigated by using a wrapper class.

Using a wrapper class

The idea is to create a class that wraps all of the new APIs exposed by a new or existing class. Each method in the wrapper class just calls through to the corresponding real method and returns the same result.

If the target class and method exist, you get the same behavior you would get by calling the class directly, with a small amount of overhead from the additional method call. If the target class or method doesn't exist, the initialization of the wrapper class fails, and your application knows that it should avoid using the newer calls.

Suppose this new class were added:

public class NewClass {
private static int mDiv = 1;

private int mMult;

public static void setGlobalDiv(int div) {
mDiv = div;
}

public NewClass(int mult) {
mMult = mult;
}

public int doStuff(int val) {
return (val * mMult) / mDiv;
}
}

We would create a wrapper class for it:

class WrapNewClass {
private NewClass mInstance;

/* class initialization fails when this throws an exception */
static {
try {
Class.forName("NewClass");
} catch (Exception ex) {
throw new RuntimeException(ex);
}
}

/* calling here forces class initialization */
public static void checkAvailable() {}

public static void setGlobalDiv(int div) {
NewClass.setGlobalDiv(div);
}

public WrapNewClass(int mult) {
mInstance = new NewClass(mult);
}

public int doStuff(int val) {
return mInstance.doStuff(val);
}
}

This has one method for each constructor and method in the original, plus a static initializer that tests for the presence of the new class. If the new class isn't available, initialization of WrapNewClass fails, ensuring that the wrapper class can't be used inadvertently. The checkAvailable method is used as a simple way to force class initialization. We use it like this:

public class MyApp {
private static boolean mNewClassAvailable;

/* establish whether the "new" class is available to us */
static {
try {
WrapNewClass.checkAvailable();
mNewClassAvailable = true;
} catch (Throwable t) {
mNewClassAvailable = false;
}
}

public void diddle() {
if (mNewClassAvailable) {
WrapNewClass.setGlobalDiv(4);
WrapNewClass wnc = new WrapNewClass(40);
System.out.println("newer API is available - " + wnc.doStuff(10));
} else {
System.out.println("newer API not available");
}
}
}

If the call to checkAvailable succeeds, we know the new class is part of the system. If it fails, we know the class isn't there, and adjust our expectations accordingly. It should be noted that the call to checkAvailable will fail before it even starts if the bytecode verifier decides that it doesn't want to accept a class that has references to a nonexistent class. The way this code is structured, the end result is the same whether the exception comes from the verifier or from the call to Class.forName.

When wrapping an existing class that now has new methods, you only need to put the new methods in the wrapper class. Invoke the old methods directly. The static initializer in WrapNewClass would be augmented to do a one-time check with reflection.

Testing is key

You must test your application on every version of the Android framework that is expected to support it. By definition, the behavior of your application will be different on each. Remember the mantra: if you haven't tried it, it doesn't work.

You can test for backward compatibility by running your application in an emulator from an older SDK, but as of the 1.5 release there's a better way. The SDK allows you to specify "Android Virtual Devices" with different API levels. Once you create the AVDs, you can test your application with old and new versions of the system, perhaps running them side-by-side to see the differences. More information about emulator AVDs can be found in the SDK documentation and from emulator -help-virtual-device.


Learn about Android 1.5 and more at Google I/O. Members of the Android team will be there to give a series of in-depth technical sessions and to field your toughest questions.


Thus the article Backward compatibility for Android applications

Enough of the articles Backward compatibility for Android applications this time, hopefully it can be of benefit to all of you. well, see you in another article post.


You are now reading the article Backward compatibility for Android applications By address link https://cellphone-prices-and-specifications.blogspot.com/2009/04/backward-compatibility-for-android.html


Previous
Next Post »
0 Komentar untuk "Backward compatibility for Android applications"

Terima Kasih Sudah Berkomentar